Thursday, November 29, 2018

Young Americans Believe U.S. Is Most Racist Nation

Young Americans Believe U.S. Is Most Racist NationAccording to a new poll from the Foundation for Liberty and American Greatness (FLAG) and the polling firm YouGov, nearly half of young Americans believe the United States to be more racist than other nations.Breitbrt

Tuesday, November 27, 2018

White Liberals Dumb Down Their Vocabulary When Speaking To Black People

A new study reveals the bias that white liberals have when speaking to black people, while white conservatives speak to black people as equals. Paul Joseph Watson exposes the hypocrisy of the left and the bigotry of low expectations.




White Liberals Dumb Down Their Vocabulary When Speaking To Black People

Sunday, November 25, 2018

Saturday, November 17, 2018

Breaking the Power of Anti-White Media



Breaking the Power of Anti-White Media

Prof's Constitutional Right to 'Hate White People' Affirmed

Hating WhiteyProf's Constitutional Right to 'Hate White People' AffirmedIt’s the First Amendment that Rutgers University history professor James Livingston can thank for avoiding punishment for posting on Facebook his hatred for “white people.”
WND

http://rightbias.com

Thursday, November 15, 2018

Women Of Color Will SAVE Our Democracy



Women Of Color Will SAVE Our Democracy

Related:

Wake Up! The TRUTH About Why Republicans Lost the House

Here's exactly why republicans lost the house, and what the future looks like. 



Vince points out the fact that non-white immigrants tend to vote Democrat, but one could argue that these non-white immigrants are also poor and looking for welfare promises rather than jobs. His example of Brasil voting the same way likely comes down to a divide between rich and poor, where the poor people of colour have a chip on their shoulders against what they perceive as the "oppressor's party". If more of the non-white immigrants had middle class jobs they would likely vote Republican in larger numbers. 

Regardless, Vince still has a point about mass migration impacting the vote outcomes. And with pro-globalist Democrats in charge, they would enact policies that would keep masses of people on welfare or in low income positions, by not standing up for National borders and sovereignty. 

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, November 9th, 2018.]

Saturday, November 10, 2018

“The First Purge” looks like “regressive, race-baiting nonsense” | Ben Davies - The First Purge: Conservatives Cull Poor People!? - THE FIRST PURGE MOVIE. RACISM IS BEING PUSHED TO FUEL A RACE WAR - The First Purge Movie Review It Sucked And It's Racist :)

Editor's Note/Spoilers: A few points about the film. The impoverished black community in the first purge experiment wasn't going to engage in much violence at all and instead was just going to party and loot a bit. They had to microchip those who were paid to stay and not purge so masked Klansman and Nazis could come in and find them to false flag exterminate the community. Well first off, Nazis were leftists, but I digress. Sorry to say, but crime statistics indicate a regular night in this community would have likely seen more violence than was depicted on the purge night where all crime was legal in the film.

In the real world, if anybody is wearing masks and getting carte blanche to engage in violence in front of law enforcement it's anti-white, racist, leftist, and ANTIFA mobs!





“The First Purge” looks like “regressive, race-baiting nonsense” | Ben Davies - The First Purge: Conservatives Cull Poor People!? - THE FIRST PURGE MOVIE. RACISM IS BEING PUSHED TO FUEL A RACE WAR - The First Purge Movie Review It Sucked And It's Racist :) 

Related:

http://antiwhiteracismexposed.blogspot.com

http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/search?q=rebel+media

Friday, November 9, 2018

Wake Up! The TRUTH About Why Republicans Lost the House

Here's exactly why republicans lost the house, and what the future looks like. 



Vince points out the fact that non-white immigrants tend to vote Democrat, but one could argue that these non-white immigrants are also poor and looking for welfare promises rather than jobs. His example of Brasil voting the same way likely comes down to a divide between rich and poor, where the poor people of colour have a chip on their shoulders against what they perceive as the "oppressor's party". If more of the non-white immigrants had middle class jobs they would likely vote Republican in larger numbers. 

Regardless, Vince still has a point about mass migration impacting the vote outcomes. And with pro-globalist Democrats in charge, they would enact policies that would keep masses of people on welfare or in low income positions, by not standing up for National borders and sovereignty. 

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, November 9th, 2018.]

What Do We Make Of The Midterm Election? - Paul Craig Roberts

Readers are asking for my thoughts about the midterm elections. 
 
Looking at this CNN map—https://www.cnn.com/election/2018/results/house–it seems that except for thin areas of the northeast and west coasts and hispanic and black enclaves in the southwest and south, the country overwhelmingly voted Republican.

In my opinion, flyover America voted Republican because the “deplorables” want to defend Trump. They want to defend him for two reasons. One is that he spoke to their economic plight caused by the US corporations exporting their jobs, leaving the American workforce and middle class hard-strapped. The other is that the adoption of Identity Politics by the Democratic Party has made the Democrats the party that hates white people—especially white heterosexual males who are defined as the victimizer of minorities, homosexuals, and women. It takes a really stupid white person to vote for Democrats who see white people as the problem. 

Until the Clintons, the Democratic Party represented the working class. The Democrats were an offset to the Republicans who represented business. This kept things in balance. But the Democrats under the Clintons gave the OK for the Republicans to send the Democrats’ voting constituency’s jobs offshore. In exchange for selling out their constituency, the Clintons obtained Republican financing for the Democratic Party. Both parties are now run by the same Big Money.

The working class, abandoned by the Democrats, now votes Republican.

The Democratic Party’s voting constituency no longer contains the dispossessed working class. The Democrats have turned to hate. They are now the party of hate. The Democrats teach hate to the “victim groups” of Identity Politics. This hate makes whites the Democratic Party’s victims. Thus, the Democrats lose the white vote but gain the “victim” vote. Immigration ensures that eventually the “victim” vote will be greater than the white vote, in which case under the rule of the Democrats’ Identity Politics, white people in America will become the victimized group. Indeed, if you pay attention to what many Democrats are saying, that is their intention.

According to reports I have read in the last few hours, 75% of Democrats want to impeach Trump.
 The reports do not say why. I think the only reason is hate. Trump is the epitome of the billionaire white male oppressor who grabs women by the pussy. 

There you have it.

What I find extraordinary is that Trump, although on the Republican ticket, ran as a Democrat. He was for peace with Russia. He was for jobs for the working class. Peace and jobs are democratic slogans. But Democrats hated him, because he is the epitome of the oppressive white male, and this irrational hate led them into an alliance with the military/security complex, which strongly opposes peace with Russia, as such a peace threatens their budget and power. The Democrats, working hand-in-hand with the Deep State have blocked peace with Russia and have championed mass third world immigration into the US, which will further wreck the economic existence of the working class, in order to gain Democratic votes from third world immigarnts to offset the lost American working class votes.

The Democrats apparently do not understand that the jobs for the illegal aliens depended on the middle class incomes of the American work force. With these incomes vanishing, illegal aliens no longer come for non-existent jobs; they come to collect welfare paid for by Americans who have lost their livlihoods.

I would say that, unless white Americans succumb to guilt and collapse, the Democratic Party is finished. The mid-term election was the Democratic Party’s last hurrah.

This would not mean that the future is rosy. The Democrats have forced Trump into an aggressive stance toward the rest of the world. It is aggression that the US cannot back up. Can Trump with his bully personality back down?

How can Trump get rid of his Israeli encumbrance? 

It doesn’t seem possible. He would have to backtrack on his embassy and other decisions, and his and his Jewish son-in-law’s close relations with Netanyahu would present not only diplomatic but also family problems if they were broken up by Trump asserting Washington’s independence of Israeli control. 

Trump’s subordination to Israel is curious as it does not gain him any political advantage among Democratic Jews. In the midterm electons, the Jews voted overwhelming for Democrats, even though Trump was the first American President, and I think the only head of state, who recognized Jerusalum as Israel’s capital. 
 
Adam Schiff, a Jew, who has risen to power in the US House of Representatives, says he can’t wait to investigate President Trump. Schiff seems confident he can get Trump. Indeed, Jews, a tiny percentage of the US population, are now placed to take over 5 of the most important House committees: Jerrold Nadler for the Judiciary Committee, Eliot Engel for Foreign Affairs, Nita Lowey, for Appropriations, Adam Schiff for Intelligence and John Yarmuth for Budget.

How to explain that Trump, the most Jewish President in the history of the US, is a target of American Jews?

Perhaps the explanation is that the Jews are more interested in breaking up gentile society, which Jews in their paranoia see as a threat to Jews, than they are in Trump’s total support of Israel’s Middle Eastern policy of genocide for the Palestinians.

Until Donald Trump, no American president ever so completely prostituted himself before the tiny, insignificant state of Israel as Trump has done. How exactly are the “deplorables” proud Americans when their man grovels under the feet of Israel?

How does Trump make American Great Again when he subordinates America to Israel?
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2018/11/07/what-do-we-make-of-the-midterm-election/


[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, November 10th, 2018.]

White Women Become New Enemy of the Left







RUSH: First story from Breitbart.com: “Leftists Blame White Women for Red State Midterm Losses.” I know you’re saying, “But wait a minute. They won the House.” Yeah, but they didn’t win… There wasn’t a blue wave.
“Leftists on Wednesday blamed ‘white women’ for high-profile Democrat midterm losses, despite those candidates running in red states. Egyptian-American journalist Mona Eltahawy tweeted Wednesday, ‘White women: footsoldiers [sic] of the patriarchy,’ along with what percentage of white women had voted for” Brian Kemp, Ted Cruz, and Ron DeSantis.” You white women that voted for white guys instead of voting for African-Americans? You are now the official enemy.
“According to the results, 76% of white women in Georgia voted for Kemp,” not for Stacy Abrams. Most white women are nowhere near as radicalized as Stacey Abrams is. Ms. Abrams, can I help? (sigh) You’re not gonna win very many mainstream voters, period, when your posters feature New Black Panthers in full-fledged military garb with AR-15s slung over their shoulders! It’s just not a welcoming message, and “white women” don’t want to be… Anybody! What kind of come-on is that?
So “76% of white women in Georgia voted for Kemp, versus 24% for Democrat candidate Stacy Abrams.” In Texas, 59% of white women voted for Cruz versus 39% for [R. Francis] O’Rourke. In Florida, it was much tighter, with 51% voting for DeSantis, and 49% voting for his opponent Andrew Gillum. In contrast, an overwhelming majority of black men and women voted for Abrams, O’Rourke, and Gillum. Abrams and Gillum are black, while O’Rourke is white,” but trending black.
“There was, however, no mention that Georgia, Texas, and Florida are red states that overwhelmingly voted Republican in the 2016 presidential race. There was also no mention that Cruz is actually Latino.” So the “Egyptian-American journalist Mona Eltahawy … tweeted that white women were voting GOP ‘against their own interests’ and allying ‘with white supremacist patriarchy,'” and by the way, this is not just verbiage.
This is actually what this woman believes: The “white supremacist patriarchy.” This is what kids are being taught in college right along with white privilege and how evil it is and the white supremacist or white Christian patriarchy, and women who vote that way are voting against their own interests and other women. So that’s one. Here’s another one from the Guardian, a different journalist, Moira Donegan. She’s writing in the Guardian.
Headline: “Half of White Women Continue to Vote Republican. What’s Wrong with Them?” Let me give you some pull quotes here. “Some 53% of white women voted for Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election… On the left, this number can elicit exasperation, rage, and even suspicions about the moral legitimacy of the feminist project.” Fifty-three percent of white women vote for Trump and that doesn’t say much good about feminism, she says here.
“It casts doubts on the political convictions of liberal white women, colors leftist perception of female-coded liberal political projects like the Women’s March, and has prompted long-overdue calls for increased political leadership by women of color.” We are not united, and don’t make the mistake of thinking that we are. Another pull quote: “The real story of white women voters is both more grim and more complex than the 53% figure reveals. The truth is that the 53% of white women who voted for Trump in [2016] was actually an improvement on even worse numbers from previous cycles.
“White women supported Mitt Romney at 56% in 2012, and supported George W Bush by 55% in 2004. Even these robust showings by Republican white women were down from their previous highs: Ronald Reagan won a staggering 62% of white women in 1984.” So “[w]hat is wrong with white women?” Moira Donegan asks. “Why do half of them so consistently vote for Republicans, even as the Republican [P]arty morphs into a monstrously ugly organization that is increasingly indistinguishable from a hate group?
“The most likely answer seems to be that white women vote for Republicans for the same reason that white men do: because they are racist.” Now, how many of you believe that the Republican Party is increasingly indistinguishable from a hate group? Can anybody show me any Republican Party mobs that have disrupted peaceful city streets like in Ferguson or in Baltimore?
Can you show me these Republican mobs that are showing up at the front doors of liberal journalists and trying to break in? Can you show me any Republican mobs showing up in Senate office buildings, trying to bully and intimidate a bunch of linguini-spined senators? You can’t. What is this “indistinguishable from a hate group” crap? It is so abundantly obvious where the hate is in this country and the rage and the anger. But, anyway, there you have it.
You white women who vote Republican, it’s no mystery anymore. It’s not really that you’re selling out and being dependent on a man for your life. It’s not that you’re cashing in. It’s not that you’re betraying. It’s that you, too, like your husbands and boyfriends and sons, you’re racist! You white women are just full-fledged racists. And it’s about time everybody said so, according to Moira Donegan in the U.K. Guardian.
Now, I love getting psychoanalyzed by — well, I’m not gonna describe her. If you saw a picture, you would. But let me just share with you this one paragraph. “But there is something else at play,” writes Moira Donegan, “There is something else at play, something more complicated, in white women’s relationship to white patriarchy.” Who thinks this way? What a bunch of convoluted, confused, dead-wrong, embarrassing, overeducated sloths.
“White women’s identity places them in a curious position at the intersection of two vectors of privilege and oppression: they are granted structural power by their race, but excluded from it by their sex. In a political system where racism and sexism are both so deeply ingrained, white women must choose to be loyal to either the more powerful aspect of their identity, their race, or to the less powerful, their sex.”
Now, folks, if that’s not out of some convoluted, psychologically distorted screwed up women’s studies curriculum, I don’t know where it’s from. To think this is what your daughters are having shoved down their throats and into their brains. Let me read this again.
“White women’s identity places them in a curious position at the intersection of two vectors of privilege and oppression.” How many of you women are running around thinking about the vectors of your position? How many of you are comparing your privilege to your oppression? How many you feel oppressed in your day-to-day lives, oppressed by your husbands, oppressed by your sons, how many of you feel this way? Versus feeling privileged some of the other times of the day.
So white women’s identity places them at that curious intersection. “They are granted structural power by their race, but excluded from it by their sex.” White women have no power in life. They’ve traded it for acceptance by the white patriarchy, i.e., their husbands. “In a political system where racism and sexism are both so deeply ingrained, white women must choose to be loyal to either the more powerful aspect of their identity, their race, or to the less powerful, their sex.”
Their race is the most powerful part of their identity. Their sex is next. “Some Republican white women might lean into racism not only for racism’s sake, but also as a means of avoiding or denying the realities of how sexist oppression makes them vulnerable.”
This is insanity. I have to take a break here, but this is what passes for brilliant intellectual, high thought, from somebody that’s obviously so disturbed that you couldn’t accurately describe it.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: There’s one other woman story. I’m gonna have to save it ’til Monday. There’s not enough time to get into it. But I’ll make sure I save it. The headline: “Why Little Boys Don’t Become Men That Women Want to Marry.” And it’s written by a woman.
And it basically is positing here that modern women are clueless about men and have no idea how relationships really work, but that it’s not their fault because the seeds of failure — i.e., women understanding men — are planted in college with not just women’s studies, but any number of outside influences. And it’s a fascinating piece here. But if I get started on it it’s just gonna be frustrating because I won’t be anywhere near finishing it. So, hey, Siri, remind me to do this women’s thing Monday morning at 10:30.
SIRI: Okay. I added this women’s thing to the reminders for Monday at 10:30 a.m.

BOMBSHELL! Media Matters Caught Doctoring Racist Video To Frame Infowars



BOMBSHELL! Media Matters Caught Doctoring Racist Video To Frame Infowars

University considers minorities-only gym

THE COLLEGE FIX:

Ohio University leaders were reportedly considering the creation of a workout room that would be designated for minority students, although a campus official has since clarified the room would be open to all students.
The original suggestion was one of at least three ideas proposed by a campus diversity leader as she and student leaders brainstorm plans to redevelop a portion of largely unused racquetball courts at the public institution.
Gigi Secuban, who took the helm over the summer as the university’s first-ever vice president of diversity and inclusion, reportedly made the suggestion at a recent student senate meeting.
“Secuban mentioned a plan to turn one of the racquetball courts at Ping Recreation Center into a private workout room for minorities, sexual assault survivors, or people with special religious accommodations,” The New Political student news outlet reported.

More from The College Fix

WHITE SOUTH AFRICANS BARRED FROM REGISTERING ON GOVERNMENT JOBS WEBSITE

WHITE SOUTH AFRICANS BARRED FROM REGISTERING ON GOVERNMENT JOBS WEBSITE

Gov initiative reportedly excluding white males


White South African men are reportedly being excluded from a government-partnered youth employment initiative program, according to a new report.
The Youth Employment Service (“YES”) government job website has the goal of helping South Africans who have been unemployed for more than six months. The program has been endorsed by the National Development Plan 2030, which intends on eliminating poverty and reducing inequality within the next 12 years in the country.
The website reportedly requires applicants to be in accordance with the Black Economic Empowerment (“BEE”) definition of black. They are also required to be between the ages of 18 and 34 and citizens of South Africa.
BEE is a program launched by the South African government whose aim is redressing inequalities in the nation by giving South African citizens who are black economic privileges that are not available to white people. The program also includes colored and Indian people.
The YES website states:
“YES is a business-driven initiative which is breaking new ground by pioneering a partnership with government and labor, in collectively tackling a national plan to build economic pathways for black youth. Please note we are currently only registering candidates between the ages of 18 and 34, who are currently unemployed and must be black (as per the B-BBEE codes definition).”
YES was the brainchild of South African president Cyril Ramaphosa. In March, he boasted about the idea, stating “we will be coming up with further initiatives to address youth unemployment.” However, South Africa’s trade union, called “Solidarity”, stated that white South Africans were “unwelcome”, while calling the exclusion “part of a long list of policies obsessed with race.”
Paul Maritz, coordinator of Solidarity Youth, told RT: “It is as if the President is saying to white candidates: ‘You are unwelcome and on your own!”
Maritz noted that unemployment is an issue of importance in South Africa, but that making decisions based on race has become a dangerous norm.
In late summer, we continued highlighting the growing tension between President Ramaphosa and white farmers who, under threat of having their land taken and repurposed, were digging their heels in, stating that they would defend their properties by force, if necessary. We looked at whether or not a coming civil race war in South Africa was an inevitability at this point.
In early September, we followed up, taking a closer look as to whether or not there was a plan in effect for the government to simply take white farms and “eliminate” white farmers by whatever means necessary. For now the market is giving Ramaphosa the benefit of the doubt.

Bernie Sanders: Many Whites ‘Uncomfortable’ Voting for Black Candidates

NTK NETWORK:

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) spoke to the Daily Beast following disappointing election results for Democrats in Georgia and Florida, particularly for African-American candidates for governor in each state.
The results of both races may still be in question Thursday, depending on final vote tallies and the potential for a recount, but had Stacey Abrams won in Georgia she would have become the nation’s first female African-American governor. In Florida, Gillum would have become the first African-American governor in the state’s history.
Sanders, a strong advocate for Abrams and Gillum, told the Daily Beast that he believed their race played a factor in their potential losses.
“I think you know there are a lot of white folks out there who are not necessarily racist who felt uncomfortable for the first time in their lives about whether or not they wanted to vote for an African-American,” Sanders told The Daily Beast, referencing the close contests involving Andrew Gillum in Florida and Stacey Abrams in Georgia. “I think next time around by the way it will be a lot easier for them to do that.”
But it’s not immediately clear what Sanders is talking about. In Florida, white voters came out for Barack Obama in huge numbers in 2008 and 2012. Nearly 4.3 million Floridians voted for Obama in Florida in 2008, besting Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) by more than 200,000 votes. In 2012, Obama earned just about 50,000 fewer votes than in 2008, carrying the state over Mitt Romney.
Political losers often struggle in the days and weeks after an unexpected or less-than-ideal election result to make sense of what happened. But Sanders’ decision to immediately blame white racism for African-American losses in 2018 appears to be factually inaccurate, based on Obama’s success in Florida, and just bad spin.
But it also might serve to remind some Democrats, particularly 2016 Clinton voters, about Sanders’ perceived slights to Obama. The Clinton campaign tried to play up Sanders’ differences with Obama during the presidential primary to varied success. His erasure of Obama from the history books in the aftermath of the 2018 midterms could feel like one more subtle criticism to some Democrats.

More from the NTK Network

Saturday, November 3, 2018

Graffiti Culprit Caught! It's Not Who'd You Expect



Graffiti Culprit Caught! It's Not Who'd You Expect

‘IT’S OKAY TO BE WHITE’ SIGNS TRIGGER LEFTISTS WORLDWIDE

‘IT’S OKAY TO BE WHITE’ SIGNS TRIGGER LEFTISTS WORLDWIDE

Media freakout insinuates it’s apparently not okay to be White


Flyers reading, “It’s okay to be white,” invaded safe spaces across the world this week, triggering virtue signaling liberals into frantic breakdowns.
The covert campaign, coordinated mainly on the website 4chan, involved posting sheets of papers reading, “It’s okay to be white,” in an effort to bring awareness to the racist double standard white people face every day.

In the wake of the postings, numerous media reports struggled to describe the campaign, with some calling it the work of neo-nazis, “covert racism,” and “white supremacist.”
Other media outlets went as far as to claim that posting the signs is illegal, while some warned removing the signs could be dangerous.
In the US, posters reportedly hit Boston, North Carolina, Delaware and Texas, where residents in Fort Worth were told to call police if they witness the sign.
“I condemn any type of literature sign that is posted that may be offensive to some folks,” Fort Worth City Councilman Cary Moon said, advising residents that taking down the signs “might interfere with investigations and collection of evidence,” according to CBS DFW.
Posters were also reported at various college campuses across the nation, including Tufts University in Massachusetts, the University of St. Thomas in Minnesota, North Carolina State University, Duke University, the University of Idaho, and the University of Delaware, with more continuing to be reported.
Elsewhere in the globe, “It’s ok to be white” posters were reportedly seen in several Canadian provincesthe UK, and Australia.
One man in Halifax, Canada, reported seeing a “group of 4 in black hoodies and white masks” posting the signs in the downtown area, which he says he tore down.
So a group of 4 in black hoodies and white masks are posting these signs all over the downtown core.
I've torn down a bunch.
Sone white people really do suck. @haligonia
Signs also showed up outside the offices of two parliament members in South Australia, prompting South Australian Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young to denounce the “pro-nazi slogans.”
“Whoever this moron is this [sic] should be named and shamed,” Hanson-Young wrote on twitter.
Just found this on the street outside my office... Whoever this moron is this should be named and shamed. Pro-nazi slogans like this are not welcome in Adelaide. Go back to the rock you crawled out from and stay there.
South Australian police say they are investigating “the motivation and intent of the persons posting the signs,” adding that they could be fined for littering.
“When the person/s responsible for posting the signs are identified and located they can be issued with a $315 fine plus $60 victims of crime levy for the offence of post bill without consent under section 23(1) of the Local Nuisance and Litter Control Act 2016,” a South Australian police spokesman said, according to The Advertiser.
SA Police also claimed there were rumors on social media that razorblades could be affixed to the posters and warned people to report the signs to police rather than remove them.
The posters appear to be a continuation of a similar campaign launched by 4chan last year, which had equally triggering results.