This flip of the switch is like day and night and indicative of deception, or perhaps goes to demonstrate how sociopathic she is. In fact, the two are not mutually exclusive! It is clear that she is an evil person. There is an abundance of those these days. Trump's friend Roger Stone provided evidence and warned that she was a leftist plant. This seems likely...
"A reliable source just told me that President Trump is sending an official White House delegation to Haiti on Monday.It looks like they may be going to attend the February 7th inauguration of Clinton puppet, money laundering parting gift to Haiti – the newly selected, “fraudulently elected” Jovenel Moise, already under investigation for money laundering.
These are the same criminals that helped the Clinton’s RAPE of Haiti in the aftermath of the earthquake. This is the puppet government of the cronies Bill and Hillary Clinton, and this is about stealing the island nations, gas, oil, and minerals. These are the same Clinton cronies and donors who stole most of US and international earthquake money through rich, no bid contracts, but built little housing.
It would be sad if this happens. Sad, that Haiti gets saddled again with a Clinton Foundation and Haiti billionaire oligarchy president that is tied to former Tonton Makout, Michel Martelly- who will rule from behind Jovenel Moise. Haitian-American supporters of Trump fear the worst, that Trump will let the corruption continue with this electoral coup d’état.
And who arranged for a White House delegation to Haiti but Omarosa Manigault of “Apprentice” fame, now serving on the White House staff. Does Omarosa not know the facts- or is it something worse?
My research shows that Omarosa traveled to Haiti in 2007 with the Haiti Support Project, which is Ron Daniels’s organization. Ron Daniels is a Democratic political operative. Daniels is most likely the man who directed the rigging of two elections for the billionaire’s front man, Jovenel Moise.
"Sean P. Jackson is chairman of the Black Republican Caucus of Florida. In a press release he said: “Omarosa has proven herself time and time again not to be trustworthy from the day she was fired from the Clinton administration, to when she was fired from (NBC’s “The Apprentice”) and … her firing from the Trump administration. None of what Omarosa alleges regarding President Trump in her book was a concern, until now, because it is a fabricated truth. Omarosa’s sick and vile attempt to discredit and defame President Trump’s character and all the many great Americans who Omarosa speaks of in her book boldly speaks to (her) lack of character…”
There’s more. Jackson charges that Omarosa joined the administration under false pretenses: “Omarosa went out of her way to prevent any black Republicans, including (its chairman) from serving in the Trump administration. Omarosa conned the entire Republican Party into believing that she was loyal to the party and would do everything possible to support President Trump’s Black America agenda, however, did the opposite. Omarosa sabotaged President Trump’s Black America agenda by refusing to allow black Republicans near the White House, ignoring policy proposals drafted and submitted by black Republicans to combat issues in black America, and by refusing to engage with black Americans or to conduct any grassroots outreach to offer inclusion with the Trump administration.”"
She was willing to not only provably commit defamation against President Trump, but to to engage in illegal espionage against her country to try and bring him down.
"In order for a public figure to prove a defamation case, they have to show that a statement was 1) false, 2) made to a third party, 3) damaging, and 4) made with “actual malice,” which means that the person making the statement either knew it was false or had reckless disregard for whether it was true.The statement about the racial slur, on the other hand, would be far more damaging, but the actual malice element could be tougher to prove. Omorosa reportedly claimed that someone told her that Luntz told them about the remark. Even if Omarosa didn’t call Luntz to verify, if she trusted the person who told her about it, and reasonably believed it to be true, that wouldn’t be actual malice." https://lawandcrime.com/legal-analysis/heres-the-real-legal-danger-for-omarosa/ BUT there is more evidence of malice because...
Omarosa Tells NPR She Heard Trump 'N-Word Tape,' Contradicting Her Own Tell-All Book:
Omarosa has executed some very leftist-like moves in that they are criminal and out of control.
The whole of the demonrat party is very far left from where there were not even that long ago. Any classical liberals in the party have decided to #WalkAway, whatever is left is the problem, all of them. Some are surely ignorant of what is going on or deluded, but circumstances are far too serious for those excuses to matter. The left must be defeated, permanently, or we are going to lose our country. I truly mean this, no hyperbole at all. The Libertarian party should become the new alternative to Republicans. http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2018/07/the-walkaway-movement-is-huge-walkaway.html
You may have noticed that liberals don’t seem to like white people who aren’t liberals very much. Many liberal minorities now regularly aim vicious attacks at white men in particular or white people as a group. You might think this would bother white liberals, but many of them actually echo those attacks, presumably in the errant hope that they’ll be looked at as one of the “cool white people” by many of their Caucasian-hating minority comrades. Not only is there no penalty on the Left for racist attacks on white people, but aiming vile hatred at white people based on the color of their skin is actively defended by liberals.
“Scroll through left-Twitter and you find utter incredulity that demonizing white people could in any way be offensive,” he said. “That’s the extent to which loathing of and contempt for ‘white people’ is now background noise on the left.”
This is, incidentally, why you hear a lot of people on the social left say there’s no such thing as ‘reverse racism.’ We interpret language through social context. Because of the way racial power structures are set up, the same set of words mean very different things when you swap out ‘white people’ for ‘black people,’ ‘Asians,’ ‘Jews,’ etc. The phrase might be racist in one context, in the sense of conveying actual racial animus, but not in another.
Of course, back in the real world, “power structures” have absolutely nothing to do with whether you hate someone for the color of his skin. For example, a white unemployed high school dropout who joins the KKK is never going to be excused for his racism by a liberal because he has no power. In that case, racism has nothing to do with “power” as far as liberals are concerned. Yet by any rational standard, that racist Cletus has a lot less power than someone like Sarah Jeong, who went to Harvard and is on the editorial board of the New York Times.
Leftists believe Oprah Winfrey has less “institutional power” than a white guy in a trailer park. That’s really all you need to know about the Left.
John Hawkins's book 101 Things All Young Adults Should Know is filled with lessons that newly minted adults need in order to get the most out of life. Gleaned from a lifetime of trial, error, and writing it down, Hawkins provides advice everyone can benefit from in short, digestible chapters.
Liberalism is now full of people like Sarah Jeong who are excused for nursing racial grievances despite the fact that they are influential, privileged, and by any reasonable standard much more powerful than the average person. These are people who aim hatred toward white people because of the color of their skin, and then we’re told that they can’t be racist because minorities have no power in a country where a black man just spent eight years as president of the United States. Jesse Jackson has no power? Al Sharpton? Ta-Nehisi Coates? Julian Bond? Leonard Pitts? Marc Lamont Hill? Charles Blow? Cornel West? Shaun King? Aiming hatred at white people is an industry in the United States and it pays well in money and attention. That’s why it’s such a growing field on the Left.
So, if you’re someone who is hated by a political party because of your skin color, what do you do about that?
Liberals certainly express a point of view about what minorities should do in that situation. They habitually falsely accuse Republicans of hating minorities and then say that means those voters are crazy if they don’t vote for them. Of course, their claim is not true. Conservatives overwhelmingly believe in judging people as individuals, by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin. Still, this is how Democrats approach this issue.
So, should white people abandon the Democrats who hate their guts? Yes, they should. Why vote for someone who defends people who hate you because of the color of your skin? Why should any individual have to be a groveling apologist because he was born a certain color? Why support a party that is prejudiced against your white child because of the color of his skin? These guys are aiming the same kind of hate at white people as their ancestors used to do at black Americans — and if you’re a white American who just shrugs your shoulders at that, you’re foolish.
You often hear this debate in America about whether people are “voting in their own interest.” If you are white, how is it in your interest to vote for a party full of people who denigrate you not because of your actions, but because of your race? How is it in your interest to support people who openly blame you for the problems in their lives because of your race and discount all of your hard-earned achievements because of imaginary “white privilege”? How is it in your interest to support people who gleefully say it will be a better country when more people like you are gone?
“The angry white guy is dying out, and the Census Bureau has already told us that by 2050, white people are going to be the minority, and I’m not sad to say I can’t wait for that day to happen. I hope I live long enough to see it because it will be a better country.” — Michael Moore
It would be a better world if we could all agree that we should judge each person as an individual, but that’s not the world Democrats want to live in. They want to live in a world where people’s accomplishments, character and beliefs are secondary to the color of their skin. It’s too bad that they chose to embrace that kind of racism and they don’t deserve your support unless they move away from it.